Copenhagen has ratings and reviews. Manny said: So what did you think?- I liked it! A lot of really interesting historical stuff about the. More information has come to light, since Michael Frayn’s play premiered in , about its subject: the ruptured friendship between the. New Vic, Newcastle-under-LymeMichael Frayn’s career-high play challenges classical drama as surely as its two scientist lead characters do.
|Published (Last):||11 February 2005|
|PDF File Size:||1.73 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.3 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
There are many other, more interesting reasons to attribute the failure frqyn the German bomb project. For example, Heisenberg refers to a “bomb having gone off” in Bohr’s head. Jeremy Bernstein in particular has done some work on it. This is an interesting play. The characters are of course infinitely fascinating as well as the setting, but it lacks the elements of live theater that the audience would crave such as any descriptions of set, placement, and interactions that give fratn to this work.
I hear there’s a TV movie based on it – Copenhagen with Daniel Craig as Werner Heisenberg – guess that’s as close as I’ll get to seeing this play.
His works often raise philosophical questions in a humorous context. At the end of that conversation, their friendship was over and Heisenberg returned to Germany. Yes, that can’t be accidental. Michael Frayn takes the historical reference to one chance and completely unexpected inexplicable almost improper meeting between Bohr and Heisenberg – once close as father and son and now sitting squarely on opposite sides of a war with consequences neither had yet grasped though they were at the very moment working towards it – and spins a fictional account of what might have transpired – all the while emphasising that the protagonists themselves may have never truly known their own motivations let alone the other’s.
They lacked the fear of an Allied project that the Allies had of them. The amount of vitriol was impressive. If you’re into stuff like this, you can read the full review.
Heisenberg tried to convey his opinions later during private discussions with Bohr. Can’t imagine how I missed reading about that earlier.
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Nov 02, Anna rated it it was amazing Shelves: This talk probably started with my question as to whether or not it was right for physicists to devote themselves in wartime to the uranium problem — as there was dopenhagen possibility that progress in this sphere could lead to grave consequences in the technique of the war.
I’ll come back and write a proper review for the book once I manage to disentangle my thoughts on it. It was very moving. Among the documents were the unsent letters Bohr drafted to Heisenberg in about Jungk’s book and other topics.
There is a great amount known about all of the primary characters presented in Copenhagen ; the following includes those bits of information which are directly relevant and referenced in the work itself. For an arts graduate. Supek received these details in a confidential conversation with Margrethe fratn thought he would never make them public. He [Bohr] replied as far as I can remember with cipenhagen counter-question, “Do you really think that uranium fission could be utilized for the construction of weapons?
They are also used to suggest Heisenberg’s speed and recklessness which contrasts with Bohr’s caution and tediousness. Retrieved 10 January After dinner, the two of them went for a walk and had a copenhafen about the point of Heisenberg’s visit. This entry was posted on Friday, February 26th, at The story focuses on physics and the atomic bomb, but most of all on relationships and et I have been copebhagen to few old plays this weekend and this one really touched me.
I actually actively hate when I can see a playwright in the writing of play, however unfair that may be. Of course, there are limits to this sort of attitude. Inthe German scientist visited Bohr, his copebhagen mentor and long-time friend, in Copenhagen.
Historical thoughts on Michael Frayn’s Copenhagen | Restricted Data
This is just a shit version of Arcadia which, in hindsight, isn’t really that good of a play either. You might have a point there. Are they simply reliving the moment over and over? The two had worked on quantum mechanics and revolutionized atomic physics in the past, but now the world had changed and the two men were on opposite sides in a world war and Denmark was under German occupation.
What do historians think, in the end, that Heisenberg was trying to do when he visited his mentor Niels Bohr in occupied Copenhagen in the fall of ? You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.
But Heisenberg was a patriotic German who was now working, probably with some reluctance, under the Nazis; Bohr, who was half-Jewish, would InGerman physicist Werner Heisenberg made a clandestine trip to have dinner with his friend, Danish physicist Niels Bohr, and his wife, Margrethe.
Heisenberg’s letters to fraynn wife and later to Jungk place his conversation with Bohr on Wednesday evening. I was wondering if I could kiss you. Loading comments… Trouble loading? What they discussed on that walk, and its implications for both scientists, have long been a mystery, even though both scientists gave conflicting accounts in later years.
Copenhagen review – Michael Frayn’s masterwork still blazes with mystery
It makes people ask me about Heisenberg. These drafts proved to be significant in several respects. Bohr and Heisenberg agree that Heisenberg started the visit by stating to Bohr that nuclear weapons were now conceivable.